ПРИРОДА І ЗМІСТ ДОВІРИ ДО СУДОВОЇ ВЛАДИ В УКРАЇНІ КРІЗЬ ПРИЗМУ СВІТОВОГО ДОСВІДУ

Abstract

Udovyka L., Novoselova V. The
nature and content of trust in
the judiciary in Ukraine through
the prism of world experience
The article is devoted to defining
the nature and content of trust in
the judiciary in the context of world
experience as a basis for restoring
trust in the judiciary in Ukraine.
It is substantiated that trust in the
judiciary is a complex, complex
phenomenon that has a social, ethical,
cultural, civilizational, psychological,
cognitive, legal nature, reflects the
perception and attitude of society,
social group, individual to the
judiciary, court decisions, formed
on the basis of assessment of its
activity and conviction in the truth
and correctness of professional,
ethical, socio-psychological actions of
judges, justice of their decisions, and
is a voluntary consciously positive
attitude, moral or effective support of
the judiciary in the present and future.
As a complex phenomenon, trust in
the judiciary has instrumental, social
and intrinsic value. The instrumental
value of trust in the judiciary is that,
having confidence in the judiciary
as a component of legal culture,
people, society build their behavior in
accordance with established rules and
requirements, if necessary, protect
their rights and interests in court,
enforce court decisions. At the same
time, the peculiarities and differences
of the national legal system and
the legal culture of society leave
an imprint both on the forms of
normativeness and on the procedural
nature of its provision. The social
value of trust in the judiciary is that
it embodies the general perception
and attitude of citizens, society as
a whole, promotes more efficient
judiciary, effective communication
between society and the judiciary. The
social value of trust in the judiciary is
determined by its ability to motivate
individuals to resolve legal conflicts.
The intrinsic value of trust in the
judiciary is that trust in the judiciary
acts as a criterion, indicator and
general measure of the effectiveness
of the judiciary, the justice of its
decisions. The high level of trust of
citizens and society in the judiciary
gives it space for independence,
transparency, transparency, openness,
implementation of measures aimed at
improving efficiency, approximation
to European standards of justice.