ХАРАКТЕРИСТИКА ВЗАЄМОДІЇ АДМІНІСТРАТИВНИХ СУДІВ ІЗ ГРОМАДСЬКІСТЮ

Abstract

Borovyk A., Hresko O. Characteristics of the interaction of administrative courts with
the public. The relevance of the article is that one of the important conditions for the proper functioning of the judiciary is the proper level of public confidence in this branch of government.
Increasing the level of trust in the activities of the judiciary in general, as well as court decisions and the
trial in particular, is achieved through the implementation of a number of joint activities, in the process of
which there is communication and exchange of information between the judiciary and the public. Experience
shows that the consequences of this interaction can be both positive and negative. First of all, this is due to
the goals set by each of the parties and different ways to achieve these goals. It is emphasized that the public
is a complex phenomenon, without which the existence of any state is impossible. It is able to influence
the activities of public authorities, thereby ensuring an appropriate level of transparency and publicity in the
adoption of government, judicial and other decisions by entities entrusted by the state with the implementation of its basic functions. It is determined that the interaction between administrative courts and the public is aimed at: first, improving the court; secondly, to ensure the protection of human rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of man and citizen. In such a synthesis, administrative courts and
the public are able to influence each other, but given the administrative and legal status of both courts in general and administrative courts in particular, in the vast majority the public is the key regulator of the court, rather than vice versa. It is concluded that the interaction of administrative courts with the public is a bilateral influence of these entities on each other, resulting in their mutual activities, which are carried out in the forms and in the ways prescribed by applicable law and aimed at achieving a common goal of proper provision and quality realization of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of individuals, as well as the rights andlegitimate interests of legal entities, and is detailed in a number of tasks, tasks and objectives, the solution of which allows the realization of such a goal.