Significance for the criminal law of Ukraine of the European Court of Human Rights judgments on human honor and dignity (concerning media rights)
Keywords:
honor of man, human dignity, case law of the European Court of Human Rights, freedom of expression, media rights, Of the Criminal Code of Ukraine
Abstract
The author discusses the main provisions of the case law of the European Court of Human Rights on issues of honor and dignity (concerning media rights). The ways of application of the mentioned provisions in the criminal law of Ukraine are proposed, namely in the scientific sphere, law - making activity, law enforcement. It emphasizes the inadmissibility of criminal offenses recognized as legal by the European Court of Human Rights.
References
1. Case of Hodgson v. the United Kingdom. —Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
2. Case of Ukrainian Media Group v. Ukraine. — http: / /cmiskp. echr. coe. int/ tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
3. Case of Jersild v. Denmark. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
4. Case of De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium.
— http: / / cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197 / search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
5. Case of Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom. — http:/ /cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
6. Case of Thorgersson v. Iceland. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
7. Case of Barfod v. Denmark. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
8. Case of Lyashko v. Ukraine. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
9. Case of Barthold v. FRG. — http: / / cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
10. Case of Case of Lingens v. Austria. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
11. Case of Oberschlick v. Austria. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
12. Case of Jerusalem v. Austria. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
13. Case of Zana v. Turkey. — http: / / cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
14. Case of Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom. — http: / /cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
15. Манукян В. И. Европейский суд по правам человека: право, прецеденты, ком - ментраии: Научно-практическое пособие.
— К.: Истина, 2006. — 368 с.
16. Case of Goodwin v. the United Kingdom. — http:/ /cmiskp. echr. coe. int/ tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
17. Case of Otto Preminger Institut v. Austria. — http: / /cmiskp. echr. coe. int/ tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
17. Case of Wingrove v. the United Kingdom. — http: / / cmiskp. echr. coe. int/ tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
18. Case of Bladet Tromso and Stensaas v. Norway. — http: / /cmiskp. echr. coe. int/ tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
19. Case of Dalban v. Romania. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
20. Case of Castells v. Spain. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
21. Шевчук С. Судовий захист прав людини: Практика Європейського суду з прав людини у контексті західної правової традиції. — Вид. 2-ге, випр, допов. — К.: Реферат, 2007. — 848 с.
2. Case of Ukrainian Media Group v. Ukraine. — http: / /cmiskp. echr. coe. int/ tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
3. Case of Jersild v. Denmark. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
4. Case of De Haes and Gijsels v. Belgium.
— http: / / cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197 / search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
5. Case of Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom. — http:/ /cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
6. Case of Thorgersson v. Iceland. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
7. Case of Barfod v. Denmark. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
8. Case of Lyashko v. Ukraine. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
9. Case of Barthold v. FRG. — http: / / cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
10. Case of Case of Lingens v. Austria. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
11. Case of Oberschlick v. Austria. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
12. Case of Jerusalem v. Austria. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
13. Case of Zana v. Turkey. — http: / / cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
14. Case of Observer and Guardian v. the United Kingdom. — http: / /cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
15. Манукян В. И. Европейский суд по правам человека: право, прецеденты, ком - ментраии: Научно-практическое пособие.
— К.: Истина, 2006. — 368 с.
16. Case of Goodwin v. the United Kingdom. — http:/ /cmiskp. echr. coe. int/ tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
17. Case of Otto Preminger Institut v. Austria. — http: / /cmiskp. echr. coe. int/ tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
17. Case of Wingrove v. the United Kingdom. — http: / / cmiskp. echr. coe. int/ tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
18. Case of Bladet Tromso and Stensaas v. Norway. — http: / /cmiskp. echr. coe. int/ tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
19. Case of Dalban v. Romania. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
20. Case of Castells v. Spain. — Http://cmiskp. echr. coe. int/tkp197/search. asp? skin=hudoc-en.
21. Шевчук С. Судовий захист прав людини: Практика Європейського суду з прав людини у контексті західної правової традиції. — Вид. 2-ге, випр, допов. — К.: Реферат, 2007. — 848 с.
