Actus reus як сукупність об'єктивних ознак складу злочину в кримінальному праві США
Abstract
In the article the author refers to particular objective elements of the Corpus delicti structure under the theory of American Criminal Law. The foremost attention of American legal scholars is dedicated to the issues of criminal act nature, what stipulates its superiority within legal studies in the specified sphere. At the same time, the doctrine of Corpus delicti still suffers from incompleteness, and remains far from perfection, as soon as the theoreticians leave without proper attention some valuable aspects.
References
Robinson P. H. Should the Criminal Law Abandon the Actus Reus — Mens Rea Distinction? / / Criminal law: action, value and structure / S. Shute, J. Gardner & J. Horder, eds. — 1993.
Austin J. Lectures on jurisprudence / John Austin. — 4th ed. — 1873.
Lynch A. C. E. The Mental Element in the Actus Reus, 98 L. Q. REV. — 1982.
Williams G. Criminal law: the general part 22 / Glanwille Williams. — 2nd ed. — 1961.
Mangiafico J. The Independence Of Actus reus / James Mangiafico. — 2011.
Fletcher G. P. Rethinking criminal law / George P. Fletcher. — 1978.
Holmes O. W. The common law / Oliver W. Holmes. — 1881.
Turner J. W. C. Kenny’s outlines of criminal law / J. W. Cicil Turner. — 19th ed. — 1966.
Wayne R. Lafave. American Casebook Series, Hornbook Series and Basic Legal Texts Nutshell Series / Wayne R. Lafave, W. Austin, Jr. Scott. — West Group, 1986. — 918 p.
Hart H. L. A. Acts of Will and Responsibility / / punishment and responsibility. — 1968.
Corrado Michael. Is There an Act Requirement in the Criminal Law? 142 U. PA. L. REV. — 1994.
